research
 Patents
 Books
 Literature
 Articles
 Timeline
 Auction Archive

about
 About this site
 Wanted to buy

bulb gallery

Incandescent:
C
carbon
WD
drawn tungsten
WC
coiled tungsten
WM
mini tungsten
WS
pressed tung.
FG
figural bulbs
XL
christmas
XS
christmas sets
T
tantalum

Discharge:
NE
neon lamps
AR
argon lamps
XE
xenon lamps
MA
mercury
MC
fluorescent
MS
special mercury

Hardware:
F
fuses
FX
fixtures
PF
plugs & fittings
SA
sockets
SW
switches

tube gallery

 X-ray
 Geissler
 Crookes
 Radio
 Box art

museum pics

 Dr. Hugh Hicks
 
Fort Myers, FL.
 S.Slabyhoudek

links

 Related links
 Submit a link

 

Author Topic: Information Desired  (Read 11660 times)

Offline Ed Covington

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 91
    • http://www.frognet.net/~ejcov/
Information Desired
« on: March 20, 2001, 07:30:00 pm »
Does anyone out there have references that describe the so-called "Siemens" seal? Was that design patented? I am aware of the mention made on page 205 of Arthur Bright's book.

Offline James

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 169
    • www.lamptech.co.uk
Information Desired
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2001, 09:02:00 am »
Hi Ed,

I inherited a lot of very old Siemens material when the Thorn factory in Preston shut down in 1994.  Thorn took over the Siemens UK division in the 1940's and when they shut the Siemens factory on Strand Road everything was transferred across town to Thorn's Kent St factory.  But I am not quite sure what you mean by the Siemens seal.  Can you provide any more info on the date or type of seal, then I can sift through the old Siemens papers I have and will let you know if I have anything of relevance.

James.

Offline Ed Covington

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 91
    • http://www.frognet.net/~ejcov/
Information Desired
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2001, 10:04:00 am »
Thanks, James, you're always a source of hard-to-get information. If you'll look in my book on page 47 the Fig. E is, I believe, what is called the Siemens seal. I assume it was developed about 1888-1891. That's about all I can tell you. The move from the design from E to F was made, I believe, because attaching the filament to copper didn't work out too well.